Thursday, 31 October 2019

New story in Technology from Time: Apple’s Noise-Canceling AirPods Pro Are Quietly Excellent



If you can believe it, there was a time in mankind’s short and brutish history when people were skeptical of Apple’s AirPods, myself included. We ridiculed the odd-looking wireless buds protruding in impossible directions from early adopters’ skulls, their ears housing buds seemingly hoping to be reunited with the rest of their 3.5mm headphone cable.

The audio accessory spawned knockoff after knockoff, failed attempts from competitors, and enough memes and class warfare jokes to keep everyone laughing until this week, when Apple debuted its noise-canceling $249 AirPods Pro. Let’s be clear: These are fantastic, and probably the best Apple product since it decided tablets should be a thing. It’s the company at its finest, refining an idea until it’s close to perfect. Thank goodness they don’t come in black — what else would I complain about?

You can peg them as AirPods even before you open the case. While larger than classic AirPods, the AirPods Pro case maintains its pill-like quality, but gets a bit wider and shorter by a few centimeters. It’ll still slip right into your pocket with ease, and supports Qi charging for all your wireless needs. Opening the AirPods Pro case reveals their oddly-shaped design, made for getting in your ear and staying there.

Those weird looks are integral to the AirPods Pro’s killer features. Perhaps the most desired addition is the new Active Noise Cancellation (ANC), which uses both outer and inner microphones to deaden sound around you. It works beautifully, and makes you realize how damn loud the world is on a regular basis. Silence never sounded so good. And while the regular AirPods are pretty good at standing up to the occasional drizzle or sweat-drenched run, they were never explicitly rated for water or dust resistance. The AirPods Pro, however, feature an actual IPX4 sweat resistance rating.

The in-ear design of the AirPods Pro means you’ll get much better sound quality compared to normal AirPods. Bass is deeper, voices are clearer, and there’s less of a tinny quality when you crank it up.

Apple’s even got a fix for the “noise isolation” issue that affects in-ear headphones, which prevents you from hearing the world around you while listening to music with a snugly fit pair of earphones. Dubbed “Transparency mode,” the AirPods Pro use its ANC software and a pressure-equalizing vent to mix environmental noise with your audio. It sounds incredibly natural compared to high-end headphones like the $600 Dolby Dimension, designed to facilitate conversation while watching TV.

Apple

In fact, when it comes to Transparency mode, the AirPods Pro blow all of their competition out of the water. Where headphones attempting the same trick would give volume to silence or magnify sounds — making a running faucet sound like a hyper-localized downpour, for instance — the AirPods Pro makes everything sound, well, just as it should. Silence is (nearly) silent and conversations feel normal, without suffering from any delay or echo. While wearing them, I don’t feel the need to raise my voice a few annoying decibels in order to hear myself speak.

The AirPods Pro are designed for Apple’s ecosystem of devices, and being a participant in Apple’s walled garden comes with some luxuries. One of the coolest new features is Audio Sharing, which lets you pipe audio from your iOS device to two different AirPods at once, essentially reviving the art of headphone-splitting, albeit in a less romantic manner. Bring the two AirPods close to the same iPhone, open their cases, and tap to pair and share.

Speaking of tapping, you won’t be doing much of that on the AirPods Pro. Instead of tapping your AirPods to pause a song or take a phone call, you’ll pinch the AirPods Pro on their protruding stem. This is powered by what the company is calling it a Force Sensor, essentially a pressure-sensitive button on the stem of each earbud. Holding either stem cycles through noise canceling options, and a trip to your iPhone’s Bluetooth settings lets you customize different tapping actions.

Average listening time is about on par with regular AirPods, topping out at about five hours before you’ll need to charge. With the case, you can expect a full 24 hours of use before you’ll need to find the nearest Lightning cable or Qi wireless charger (or Samsung smartphone). You can turn both Transparency mode and ANC off to get an extra thirty minutes of battery life.

Of course, each upgrade of Apple’s AirPods has only gotten pricier, and the AirPods Pro are no different. At $249, they’re just as costly as noise-canceling earbuds from Bose or Sony. It’s also yet another “Pro” device from Apple lacking a USB-C port, opting instead to use the Apple-exclusive Lightning connector like the AirPods before it. But the AirPods Pro offer so much bang for your buck it’s hard to fault the wireless earbuds for much at all.

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Divided House passes Dem-backed guidelines for Trump impeachment as Republicans fume

10/31/19 8:33 AM

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

House begins debate on Democrat-backed rules for impeachment inquiry

10/31/19 6:10 AM

Wednesday, 30 October 2019

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Washington Nationals top Houston Astros in Game 7 to claim World Series title

10/30/19 9:12 PM

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Washington Nationals top Houston Astros in Game 7 to claim World Series title

10/30/19 8:53 PM

New story in Technology from Time: Google’s Pixelbook Go Is the Best-Looking Chromebook Out There — But There Are Better Options for the Money



Google’s been pushing its Chromebooks on us since it released the matte black CR-48 prototype in 2010, telling the world that laptops today were simply glorified web browsers — or Android devices, I’m still not sure which. In a way, it was right. Chromebooks have become incredibly popular devices for children and teens in school, and even as secondary laptops at home thanks to features like instant booting, touchscreen displays, and a pretty low price. They’re also dead simple to use if all you need is the web, which is what most of us want anyway for checking emails, griping about the news, or watching videos online.

Still, Google’s new Pixelbook Go lacks amenities or features that would make it feel like anything besides that prototype laptop from a decade ago. It’s certainly adorable, and at $650 is affordable compared to high-end laptops. But those good looks can’t make up for what’s missing, and what’s missing is a laptop with forward-looking features.

It’s certainly the most appealing Chromebook around. Its matte black magnesium build, rubbery bottom, rounded corners, stereo speakers, and a huge trackpad make it feel surprisingly high-end. It’s got a USB-C port on each side, along with a single headphone jack. It’s also super thin, and weighs a few ounces over two pounds. It’s a real looker, a rarity among laptops at this price point.

In terms of specifications, the Pixelbook Go feels like any other laptop. The 13-inch touchscreen display packs a 1080p resolution (and 1080p webcam), it has 64GB of storage, and a healthy 8GB of RAM (the $1399 model gets you a 4K UHD screen, quadruple the storage, and double the memory). The display’s especially reflective screen makes outdoor use a hassle, but videos look pretty crisp.

Chrome OS itself is suited perfectly for the Pixelbook Go. The operating system, based on the Chrome web browser and capable of running Android apps, is not designed for crazy workloads or serious production work, but more for writing, web browsing, and some app use. Download your game of the week, install Netflix, maybe add Slack to check in on work, and go about your day. And go about your day you can, as the Pixelbook Go’s battery life will get you about 12 hours of use before you’ll need to charge it up again.

If you’re looking for a Chromebook that facilitates more creative work, like drawing, you can certainly accomplish that with the Pixelbook Go, albeit with your finger. But that’s where the Pixelbook Go begins to falter. It lacks any pen support, so you can’t use Google’s Pixelbook Pen with it. And don’t count on serious photo or video editing.

Other missteps include the lack of any biometric security features, meaning you’re forced to type your password or other authentication information manually. A fingerprint sensor enabling quick login or authentication would do wonders for a laptop billed as being ready to go whenever you are. As for the whole “Go” portion, it feels like a failure of imagination to leave off any cellular connectivity, especially since the creation of Google Fi, the company’s wireless service.

Where’s my LTE-equipped Chromebook? Sure, it may not be popular, due to extra costs and the fact that, in a pinch, you could simply use your smartphone as a wireless hotspot for your Chromebook. But that adds another layer of complexity it feels like the Pixelbook Go should attempt to simplify if it wants you to experience the web wherever or whenever.

All in all, the Pixelbook Go feels like another reference design instead of an actual laptop. Competitors like Dell offer better-equipped Chromebooks, like the Inspiron Chromebook 14, a two-in-one laptop with an integrated stylus that, while not as svelte, can do more in general, bringing you better value for the money. Still, if you know exactly what you need out of it, there’s something about it’s cool factor that might make you look twice at the Pixelbook Go.

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Southern California, surrounding area ordered evacuated amid wildfire threat

10/30/19 7:40 AM

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Jeffrey Epstein’s fatal injuries consistent with homicide, famed medical examiner tells ‘Fox & Friends’ in exclusive interview

10/30/19 4:35 AM

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Famed forensic pathologist Michael Baden to make explosive claim regarding death of Jeffrey Epstein in ‘Fox & Friends’ interview

10/30/19 4:20 AM

Tuesday, 29 October 2019

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Masked Iraqi security forces open fire on protesters, killing 18: report

10/29/19 2:35 AM

Monday, 28 October 2019

New story in Technology from Time: Facebook Was Used to Incite Violence in Myanmar. A New Report on Hate Speech Shows It Hasn’t Learned Enough Since Then



Hate speech targeted at minorities in the northeastern Indian state of Assam is spreading almost unabated through Facebook at the same time as the Indian government is stripping nearly 2 million people there of citizenship, according to a new report released Tuesday.

Posts targeting religious and ethnic minorities in Assam have been seen more than 5.4 million times, according to the global online advocacy group Avaaz, calling into question the success of the approach taken by Facebook since it was used to spread hate speech during the 2017 Rohingya genocide.

“I’m not sure what lessons Facebook has learned from the Rohingya crisis,” Alaphia Zoyab, a senior campaigner at Avaaz who led the team that wrote the report, tells TIME. “If they’re waiting for actual violence, that’s too late. They need to heed the warnings now.”

In August this year, the Indian government published its final list of citizens of Assam, leaving 1.9 million people off. The ruling Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) sold the exercise as a means of rooting out illegal immigrants from bordering Bangladesh. But rights groups said it risked making millions stateless and inflaming Hindu-Muslim tensions in the region.

The situation in Assam has drawn comparisons to the Buddhist extremist campaign against Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar which peaked in 2017, forcing more than 700,000 to flee their homes. In Hindu-majority India, Muslims have faced a surge in attacks since the BJP took power. In Assam, some 1.9 million people, many believed to be from the Bengali-speaking minority, are threatened with statelessness as a result of government measures aimed at removing “infiltrators” from the country. “We are very worried about something like the Rohingya crisis playing out again,” Human Rights Watch told TIME in August.

Bengali Muslims in particular seem to be the targets of hate speech on Facebook, according to Avaaz, which found posts on the site calling them “parasites,” “rats” and “rapists,” and calling for them to be exterminated.

After the Rohingya genocide, Facebook was criticized for not employing any Burmese-speakers able to detect and remove hate speech. Facebook said in 2018 it had not “done enough” to prevent the genocide, and had since “invested heavily in people, technology and partners to address the abuse of Facebook in Myanmar.”

But the Avaaz report, which focuses on hate speech in the Assamese language, calls into question whether Facebook’s systems to detect hate speech in languages other than English is working. “Facebook is relying too heavily on artificial intelligence to detect hate speech,” Zoyab tells TIME. “Our research shows that reliance is based on a false premise, because it assumes people are flagging hate-speech, which then teaches its artificial intelligence systems. That’s not happening.”

Facebook did not immediately respond to questions from TIME inquiring how many Assamese speakers it employs as part of its 15,000-strong team of content moderators.

Avaaz said it reported 213 of the “clearest examples of hate speech” to Facebook, but said that the site had removed only 96 of them for breaching its community standards. The report details one case where one individual inciting hatred against Bengali Muslims had his page removed by Facebook seven times, only to set up new accounts each time and continue posting.

“When we flagged the hate speech in Assam online using Facebook’s online reporting tools, Facebook sent us back automated messages saying that this does not breach their community standards,” Zoyab says. “Facebook keeps saying it has a zero tolerance policy toward hate speech, but Assam seems to prove that it’s a one hundred percent failure.”

“When you become stateless, you essentially lose your right to have rights,” Zoyab says. “Overall we just find Facebook is asleep at the wheel here in protecting the world’s most vulnerable people.”

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

ISIS spokesman Abu Hassan al-Muhajir, considered potential al-Baghdadi successor, also killed in Syria, official says

10/28/19 11:53 AM

New story in Technology from Time: Apple Debuts AirPods Pro, With ‘New Design’ and Noise Canceling Capabilities



(Bloomberg) — Apple Inc. has announced the AirPods Pro, a higher-end version of its popular headphones that add noise-cancellation, water-resistance and a new design.

The model priced at $249 will sell alongside the current $159 version that launched in March, and marks the first time that Apple is segmenting its AirPods line in a significant way. Bloomberg News reported last year that the company was planning higher-end AirPods for 2019.

The new model will begin shipping Oct. 30, Apple said in a statement.

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Attorney General Barr defends Durham probe, rips Comey's FBI leadership in exclusive interview

10/28/19 8:21 AM

Sunday, 27 October 2019

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Rep. Katie Hill resigns amid ethics probe into reported affair with staffer

10/27/19 4:10 PM

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

President Trump confirms al-Baghdadi death, says he spent last minutes 'whimpering' in dead-end tunnel

10/27/19 7:08 AM

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

ISIS leader Baghdadi confirmed dead after apparent suicide during U.S. operation, sources tell Fox News

10/27/19 4:52 AM

Friday, 25 October 2019

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Felicity Huffman released from prison after serving 11 days in college admissions case

10/25/19 8:20 AM

New story in Technology from Time: A Study Analyzed 10 Million Online Posts Over 3.5 Years. It Found a Torrent of Transphobic Abuse



A new report analyzing 10 million social media and online posts in the U.S. and U.K. over three and a half years found 1.5 million transphobic posts, highlighting the level of cyber-abuse targeting transgender people.

Anti-bullying charity Ditch the Label and consumer intelligence company Brandwatch partnered on the study, which found that in the U.S., race was the leading driver of transphobic online comments. In the U.K., politically-driven abuse was the most prominent topic in conversations including transphobic comments. Other themes found within transphobic comments included parenting, religion, gender, sports and healthcare. The study analyzed platforms including social media services like Twitter and Instagram, as well as YouTube, forums and news websites.

“Unfortunately these findings don’t surprise me. For someone who is in the public eye, I experience abuse on a daily basis,” British transgender model and activist Munroe Bergdorf said in a statement, adding that she had seen most of the transphobic comments included in the report on her own social media timeline, ranging from memes to threats to her safety. “I was interested to see the relationship between transphobia and racism and do feel that racist people see transphobia as a tool to legitimize their racism. I’ve had transphobic comments on photos of me mixed in with Nazi speech on a number of times.”

Across the platforms surveyed, high percentages of transphobic comments appeared on news sites and web forums. The study also noted a large volume of abusive commentary on YouTube. The study furthermore looked at transphobic comments in the context of world events, noting a spike in abusive comments in the U.S. before and after President Trump proposed a ban on transgender people serving in the military in July of 2017. However, the study also noted that spikes in transphobic conversation in the U.K. “was simply due to an anti-trans joke being shared lots of times.”

“As a trans woman of color, being subjected to these comments is extremely difficult to navigate,” said Bergdorf. “You have to be dead inside to not let it bother you and it’s made even harder when you experience it all the time and the people perpetrating it don’t seem to be sanctioned for their behavior.”

New story in Technology from Time: 12 Innovations That Will Change Health Care and Medicine in the 2020s



Pocket-size ultrasound devices that cost 50 times less than the machines in hospitals (and connect to your phone). Virtual reality that speeds healing in rehab. Artificial intelligence that’s better than medical experts at spotting lung tumors. These are just some of the innovations now transforming medicine at a remarkable pace.

No one can predict the future, but it can at least be glimpsed in the dozen inventions and concepts below. Like the people behind them, they stand at the vanguard of health care. Neither exhaustive nor exclusive, the list is, rather, representative of the recasting of public health and medical science likely to come in the 2020s.

David Abney: Drone-delivered medical supplies

Since March, UPS has been conducting a trial program called Flight Forward, using autonomous drone deliveries of critical medical samples including blood or tissue between two branches of a hospital in Raleigh, N.C., located 150 yards apart. A fleet-footed runner could cover the distance almost as fast as the drones, but as a proof-of-concept program, it succeeded, and in October the FAA granted the company approval to expand to 20 hospitals around the U.S. over the next two years. “We expect UPS Flight Forward to one day be a very significant part of our company,” says UPS CEO David Abney of the service, which will deliver urine, blood and tissue samples, and medical essentials like drugs and transfusable blood. UPS is not alone in pioneering air deliveries. Wing, a division of Google’s parent company Alphabet, received similar, but more limited, FAA approval to make deliveries for both Walgreens and FedEx. And in Ghana and Rwanda, drones operated by Silicon Valley startup Zipline are already delivering medical supplies to rural villages. —Jeffrey Kluger

Christine Lemke: The biggest Big Data

There are 7.5 billion humans, and tens of millions of us track our health with wearables like smart watches, as well as with more traditional devices like blood-pressure monitors. If there were a way to aggregate all that data from even a few million of us and make it all anonymous but searchable, medical researchers would have a powerful tool for drug development, lifestyle studies and more. California-based Big Data firm Evidation has developed just such a tool, with information from 3 million volunteers providing trillions of data points. Evidation partners with drug manufacturers like Sanofi and Eli Lilly to parse that data; that work has led to dozens of peer-reviewed studies already, on subjects ranging from sleep and diet to cognitive-health patterns. For founder Christine Lemke, one of Evidation’s ongoing projects, to see if new technologies can effectively measure chronic pain, is personal: Lemke has a rare genetic disease that causes frequent back pain. Evidation is partnering with Brigham and Women’s Hospital on the project.—Jeffrey Kluger

Doug Melton: A stem-cell cure for diabetes

Type 1 diabetes affects 1.25 million Americans, but two in particular got Harvard biologist Doug Melton’s attention: his daughter Emma and son Sam. Treatment can involve a lifetime of careful eating, insulin injections and multiple daily blood-glucose tests. Melton has a different approach: using stem cells to create replacement beta cells that produce insulin. He started the work over 10 years ago, when stem-cell research was raising hopes and controversy. In 2014 he co-founded Semma Therapeutics—the name is derived from Sam and Emma—to develop the technology, and this summer it was acquired by Vertex Pharmaceuticals for $950 million. The company has created a small, implantable device that holds millions of replacement beta cells, letting glucose and insulin through but keeping immune cells out. “If it works in people as well as it does in animals, it’s possible that people will not be diabetic,” Melton says. “They will eat and drink and play like those of us who are not.”—Don Steinberg

Abasi Ene-Obong: A more diverse global bio bank

A major limitation threatens to hamper the era of personalized medicine: people of Caucasian descent are a minority in the global population yet make up nearly 80% of the subjects in human-genome research, creating blind spots in drug research. Dr. Abasi Ene-Obong, 34, founded 54gene to change that. Named for Africa’s 54 countries, the Nigeria-based startup is sourcing genetic material from volunteers across the continent, to make drug research and development more equitable. 54gene is conscious of the ugly history of colonial exploitation in Africa. If companies are going to profit by developing marketable drugs based on the DNA of African people, Africa should benefit: so, when partnering with companies, 54gene prioritizes those that commit to including African countries in marketing plans for any resulting drugs. “If we are part of the pathway for drug creation, then maybe we can also become part of the pathway to get these drugs into Africa,” Ene-Obong says.—Corinne Purtill

Sean Parker: A disruptive approach to cancer research

One of the original disrupters of the new economy is bringing his approach to medical research. The Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, established by Napster co-founder and former Facebook president Sean Parker, is a network of top institutions including Memorial Sloan Kettering, Stanford, the MD Anderson Cancer Center and more. Its goal is to identify and remove obstacles to innovation in traditional research. For example, all of its scientists share a single Institutional Review Board, which “allows us to get major clinical trials off the ground in weeks rather than years,” says Parker, and at lower costs. Perhaps most important, Parker wants to infuse the project with his market sensibility: “We follow the discoveries coming from our researchers and then put our money behind commercializing them,” he says, either by licensing a product or spinning it out into a company. Since its founding in 2016, the institute has brought 11 projects to clinical trials and supported some 2,000 research papers.

Thomas Reardon: A watch that can read your mind

A man wearing what looks like a chunky black wristwatch stares at a tiny digital dinosaur leaping over obstacles on a computer screen before him. The man’s hands are motionless, but he’s controlling the -dinosaur—with his brain. The device on his wrist is the CTRL-kit, which detects the electrical impulses that travel from the motor neurons down the arm muscles and to the hand almost as soon as a person thinks about a particular movement. “I want machines to do what we want them to do, and I want us to not be enslaved by the machines,” says Thomas Reardon, CEO and co-founder of CTRL-Labs, the device maker. The hunched-over posture and fumbling keystrokes of the smartphone era represent “a step backward for humanity,” says Reardon, a neuroscientist who, in a past life, led the development of Microsoft’s Internet Explorer. The technology could open up new forms of rehabilitation and access for patients recovering from a stroke or amputation, as well as those with Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative conditions, Reardon says.—Corinne Purtill

Jonathan Rothberg: An ultrasound in your pocket

There are more than 4 billion people globally who don’t have access to medical -imaging—and could benefit from Butterfly iQ, a handheld ultrasound device. Jonathan Rothberg, a Yale genetics researcher and serial entrepreneur, figured out how to put ultrasound technology on a chip, so instead of a $100,000 machine in a hospital, it’s a $2,000 go-anywhere gadget that connects to an iPhone app. It went on sale last year to medical professionals. “Our goal is to sell to 150 countries that can pay for it. And [the Gates Foundation] is distributing it in 53 countries that can’t,” Rothberg says. For example, the foundation is funding a project bringing Butterfly iQ to rural Uganda, to scan children for pneumonia. The device isn’t as good as the big machines are and won’t replace them in prosperous parts of the world. But it could make scanning more routine. “There was a time when the thermometer was only used in a medical setting, when a blood-pressure cuff was only used in a medical center,” Rothberg says. “Democratizing [health] happens on -multiple dimensions.”—Don Steinberg

Shravya Shetty: Cancer-diagnosing artificial intelligence

Symptoms of lung cancer usually don’t appear until its later stages, when it’s difficult to treat. Early screening of high-risk populations with CT scans can reduce the risk of dying, but it comes with risks of its own. The U.S. National Institutes of Health found that 2.5% of patients who received CT scans later endured needlessly invasive -treatments—-sometimes with fatal results—after radiologists erroneously diagnosed false positives. Shravya Shetty believes artificial intelligence may be the solution. Shetty is the research lead of a Google Health team that in the past two years built an AI system that outperforms human radiologists in diagnosing lung cancer. After being trained on more than 45,000 patient CT scans, Google’s algorithm detected 5% more cancer cases and had 11% fewer false positives than a control group of six human radiologists. The early results are promising, but “there’s a pretty big gap between where things are and where they could be,” says Shetty. “It’s that potential impact that keeps me going.”—Corinne Purtill

Joanna Shields: AI to read every science paper

Every year, more than 2 million peer-reviewed research papers are published—far too many for any individual scientist to digest. Machines, however, don’t share this human limitation. BenevolentAI has created algorithms that scour research papers, clinical trial results and other sources of biomedical information in search of previously overlooked relationships between genes, drugs and disease. BenevolentAI CEO Joanna Shields was an executive at companies such as Google and Facebook, and then the U.K.’s Minister for Internet Safety and Security, before joining BenevolentAI. A frequent critic of the tech industry’s lapses in protecting young people from exploitation and abuse online, Shields sees BenevolentAI as an opportunity to harness technology’s power for good. “All of us have family members, friends who are diagnosed with diseases that have no treatment,” she says. “Unless we apply the scaling and the principles of the technology revolution to drug discovery and development, we’re not going to see a change in that outcome anytime soon.” —Corinne Purtill

Sean Slovenski: Walmart-ification of health care

Whenever the world’s biggest retailer aims its gigantic footprint at a new market, the ground shakes. In September, Walmart opened its first Health Center, a medical mall where customers can get primary care, vision tests, dental exams and root canals; lab work, X-rays and EKGs; counseling; even fitness and diet classes. The prices are affordable without insurance ($30 for an annual physical; $45 for a counseling session), and the potential is huge. In any given week, the equivalent of half of America passes through a Walmart. “When I first started here … [I] thought, That can’t be true,” says Sean Slovenski, a former Humana exec who joined Walmart last year to lead its health care push. If the concept spreads, repercussions await in every direction. Like Walmart’s merchandise suppliers, doctors and other medical pros may need to adjust to the retailer’s everyday low prices. Still, cautions Moody’s analyst Charles O’Shea: “Health care is multiple times harder than selling food.”—Don Steinberg

Charles Taylor: 3-D digital hearts

For too many people with suspected heart problems, invasive catheterization is necessary to diagnose blocked or narrowed arteries. Doctors must then choose the best method for improving blood flow from a handful of options, including balloon angioplasty and stenting. Charles Taylor, a former Stanford professor, started HeartFlow to help patients avoid invasive diagnostic procedures and improve treatment outcomes. The company’s system creates personalized 3-D models that can be rotated and zoomed into, so doctors can simulate various approaches on screens. In some cases, it can help avoid invasive procedures entirely. “By adding the HeartFlow … to our available resources for diagnosing stable coronary disease, we are able to provide patients with better care as we evaluate risk,” said Duke University cardiologist Manesh Patel, at the American College of Cardiology’s annual meeting in March. —Jeffrey Kluger

Isabel Van de Keere: Rehab in virtual reality

Isabel Van de Keere was at work one day in 2010 when a steel light fixture pulled loose from the ceiling and fell on her. The accident left Van de Keere, a Belgian-born Ph.D. in biomedical engineering, with a cervical spine injury and severe vertigo that required three years of intense neurological rehabilitation. She practiced the same tedious exercises dozens of times in a row, with progress so slow it seemed undetectable. Now 38, she’s the founder and CEO of Immersive Rehab, a London-based startup whose goal is to change the neurological–rehab experience using virtual reality. By expanding the range and type of exercises patients can try, VR creates more opportunities to harness the brain’s plasticity and repair neural pathways; increases the amount of data caregivers can use to measure progress and adapt programs; and improves the monotonous, frustrating experience of rehab. Feedback from volunteer patients and therapists has been promising; the company is now preparing to run clinical trials in the U.S. and Europe.—Corinne Purtill

Thursday, 24 October 2019

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Durham's investigation into possible FBI misconduct is now criminal probe, sources say

10/24/19 6:37 PM

New story in Technology from Time: Employees Accuse Google of Developing ‘Surveillance Tool’ to Prevent Unions



Google employees are accusing the company’s leadership of developing an internal surveillance tool that they believe will be used to monitor workers’ attempts to organize protests and discuss labor rights.

Earlier this month, employees said they discovered that a team within the company was creating the new tool for the custom Google Chrome browser installed on all workers’ computers and used to search internal systems. The concerns were outlined in a memo written by a Google employee and reviewed by Bloomberg News and by three Google employees who requested anonymity because they aren’t authorized to talk to the press.

The tool would automatically report staffers who create a calendar event with more than 10 rooms or 100 participants, according to the employee memo. The most likely explanation, the memo alleged, “is that this is an attempt of leadership to immediately learn about any workers organization attempts.”

A representative for Alphabet Inc.’s Google said, “These claims about the operation and purpose of this extension are categorically false. This is a pop-up reminder that asks people to be mindful before auto-adding a meeting to the calendars of large numbers of employees.” The extension was prompted by an increase in spam around calendars and events, according to Google. It doesn’t collect personally identifiable information, nor does it stop the use of calendars but rather adds a speed bump when employees are reaching out to a large group, the company said.

The conflicting views of the tool underscore growing tension between Google’s leadership and rank-and-file employees. On Oct. 21, several dozen workers at Google’s office in Zurich held an event about workers’ rights and unionization despite their managers’ attempts to cancel it, and last month, contract workers for Google in Pittsburgh voted to join the United Steelworkers.

In the last 18 months or so, employees have protested leadership’s handling of sexual harassment complaints and launched internal campaigns against some Google projects, including a censored search engine in China and a contract with the Pentagon to analyze drone footage.

The employee’s memo suggests that the new Chrome extension is intended to help Google employees apply newly unveiled “community guidelines,” which discourage employees from debating politics, a shift away from its famously open culture. A Google spokeswoman said in August that the company was also building a tool to let employees flag problematic internal posts and creating a team of moderators to monitor conversations on company chat boards.

It’s not known if that tool is same as the Chrome extension related to employee calendars and meetings. Google didn’t immediately respond to a question seeking to clarify.

The Chrome tool is expected to be rolled out in late October, according to the employee’s memo, which was posted on an internal message board earlier this week, according to one of the employees. Two other Google staffers in California said the tool was added to their work computers this week. And another employee said the issue was the most requested topic to discuss at the weekly all-staff meetings, typically held on Thursdays.

Work on the tool appears to have begun in early September, according to two Google employees who reviewed the memo and said they independently verified parts of the plan. In late September, it was subject to a review by Google’s privacy team, which is the norm for any new planned product launch at the company, the employees said. The team approved the release of the tool, but noted that there were “a number of concerns with respect to the culture at Google,” according to the employee’s memo.

Google said the tool has been in development for months and went through standard privacy, security and legal reviews.

In early October, the engineers responsible for developing the extension wrote that employees would not be able to remove it once it was installed on their computers and that it would be “used for policy enforcement,” according to the review and two Google employees. The plans began attracting attention within the company, the two employees said, and in mid-October, some Google employees were blocked from accessing internal design documents related to the project.

The author of the review described the extension as “creepy” and suggested, apparently in jest, that the Chrome extension should be named, “not-a-trojan-horse_dot_exe”.

On an internal Google message board, employees have posted satirical memes mocking the plan. One meme contained an image of a group of men in suits laughing, with a caption that reads: “And then we told them, ‘WE WILL NOT make it appear to you that we are watching out for your protected concerted activities’ as we pushed a Chrome extension to report when someone makes a meeting with 100+ people.”

Another meme contained an image from a scene in a Harry Potter film, in which the character Professor Dolores Umbridge teaches a class on how to defend against “dark arts.” The caption reads: “Google decree number 24: no employee organization or meeting with over 100 participants may exist without the knowledge and approval of the high inquisitor.”

New story in Technology from Time: AI and Health Care Are Made for Each Other



Artificial intelligence has the potential to radically change health care. Imagine a not too distant future when the focus shifts away from disease to how we stay healthy.

At birth, everyone would get a thorough, multifaceted baseline profile, including screening for genetic and rare diseases. Then, over their lifetimes, cost-effective, minimally invasive clinical-grade devices could accurately monitor a range of biometrics such as heart rate, blood pressure, temperature and glucose levels, in addition to environmental factors such as exposure to pathogens and toxins, and behavioral factors like sleep and activity patterns. This biometric, genetic, environmental and behavioral information could be coupled with social data and used to create AI models. These models could predict disease risk, trigger advance notification of life-threatening conditions like stroke and heart attack, and warn of potential adverse drug reactions.

Health care of the future could morph as well. Intelligent bots could be integrated into the home through digital assistants or smartphones in order to triage symptoms, educate and counsel patients, and ensure they’re adhering to medication regimens.

AI could also reduce physician burnout and extend the reach of doctors in underserved areas. For example, AI scribes could assist physicians with clinical note-taking, and bots could help teams of medical experts come together and discuss challenging cases. Computer vision could be used to assist radiologists with tumor detection or help dermatologists identify skin lesions, and be applied to routine screenings like eye exams. All of this is already possible with technology available today or in development.

But AI alone can’t effect these changes. To support the technical transformation, we must have a social transformation including trusted, responsible, and inclusive policy and governance around AI and data; effective collaboration across industries; and comprehensive training for the public, professionals and officials. These concerns are particularly relevant for health care, which is innately complex and where missteps can have ramifications as grave as loss of life. There will also be challenges in balancing the rights of the individual with the health and safety of the population as a whole, and in figuring out how to equitably and efficiently allocate resources across geographical areas.

Data is the starting point for AI. And so we need to invest in the creation and collection of data–while ensuring that the value created through the use of this data accrues to the individuals whose data it is. To protect and preserve the integrity of this data, we need trusted, responsible, inclusive legal and regulatory policies and a framework for governance. GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) is a good example: in the E.U., GDPR went into effect in May 2018, and it is already helping ensure that the health care industry handles individuals’ information responsibly.

Commercial companies cannot solve these problems alone–they need partnerships with government, academia and nonprofit entities. We need to make sure that our computer scientists, data scientists, medical professionals, legal professionals and policymakers have relevant training on the unique capabilities of AI and an understanding of the risks. This kind of education can happen through professional societies like the American Society of Human Genetics and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which have the necessary reach and infrastructure.

Perhaps most important, we need diversity, because AI works only when it is inclusive. To create accurate models, we need diversity in the developers who write the algorithms, diversity in the data scientists who build the models and diversity in the underlying data itself. Which means that to be truly successful with AI, we will need to overlook the things that historically set us apart, like race, gender, age, language, culture, socioeconomic status and domain expertise. Given that history, it won’t be easy. But if we want the full potential of AI to be brought to bear on solving the urgent needs in global health care, we must make it happen.

Miller is a director of artificial intelligence and research at Microsoft, where she focuses on genomics and health care

Wednesday, 23 October 2019

New story in Technology from Time: Google’s Pixel 4 Dominates the Smartphone Camera Battle — But Otherwise it’s Pretty Boring



After years of pretty dull smartphone design, we’re finally getting some interesting ideas, like foldable phones, that recall the weird, early days of rotating, flipping and docking devices. The new $799 Google Pixel 4 and larger $899 4 XL, however, are definitely in the “boring” category, at least on first glance. But that’s because everything special about these phones lies under the hood.

The Pixel 4’s standout feature is its software, which closes the gap between itself and the competition, along with an improved pair of cameras that will show you everything your heart desires, even the stars in the night sky. No, really, this phone can take pictures of stars, as long as you’re in the right place at the right time. The Pixel 4 (and, in this particular review, the 4 XL) feels at times like the most incremental revision imaginable, one that could’ve been made with a software update. But a bit of new hardware gives the Pixel 4, and Google’s AI-powered services, more to work with, and enough to make you say “wow!” after you snap a photo you didn’t think was possible.

If you think the Pixel 4’s design looks like a lazy tweaking of its Pixel 3 predecessor, you’re not alone. Not much has changed in terms of general looks. The new, somewhat rough black aluminum band running along its perimeter contrasts nicely with the smooth Gorilla Glass exterior completely covering the rear (colors include white, black and orange). That band is pressure-sensitive, and a quick squeeze will activate Google Assistant, sparing you from uttering wake words to get your device’s attention.

There’s no more fingerprint sensor, replaced with Google’s Face Unlock feature (or your traditional passcode). Yes, there’s a thin bezel on this already tall smartphone, but when placed side by side with its predecessor, you’ll appreciate the uninterrupted display. The Pixel 4 XL also ditches the controversial “notch” that housed the Pixel 3 XL’s front-facing camera and sensors, giving you all the pixels you paid for in lovely HDR for more accurately reproduced colors.

The boosted screen refresh rate — up to 90 times per second — makes the Pixel 4 XL’s 6.3-inch display feel smooth as silk. That QHD+ display beats the iPhone 11 Pro Max’s 6.5-inch screen when it comes to resolution, though the latter does support both the improved HDR10 and Dolby Vision.

There’s a new radar sensor embedded into the front of the Pixel 4 as well. That enables Google’s new Motion Sense feature, which detects when you’re approaching the Pixel 4 and lets you swipe through music, dismiss alarms, and silence calls by waving at your screen.

Motion Sense, combined with Google’s Face unlock, makes getting into your phone ultra-quick. In fact, the phone might be too eager to open up — the Pixel 4’s Face unlock feature works whether you’re staring at your phone or not. That means someone could grab your phone in the night, point it at your sleeping face, and get all up in your apps while you dream your little dreams. Google says it’s working on a fix that will require both your eyes to be open to unlock the device.

The Pixel 4 lacks a headphone jack, and doesn’t include USB-C headphones in the box. That’s a glaring omission by Google, though it’s offering $100 in credit for accessories if you purchase the device through its Google Store. Battery life is also an issue. At the end of the day, I’d often find myself nearly out of juice as I arrived home, and was surprised at how quickly it drained just sitting there, doing nothing.

What you’ll notice on the back is the large camera square, similar to the iPhone 11’s equally prominent bump. The new camera setup puts a 16-megapixel telephoto lens and 12-megapixel wide-angle lens in the mix, a necessary change after Google went with a single lens powered by Google’s software-based magic in the previous model.

For photographers, the Pixel 4 goes head-to-head with any other smartphone, no matter the lens count. Its night photography feature is nearly unbeatable (by standing still for a few seconds, you can turn low-light photo conditions into perfectly adequate Instagram-worthy posts), and the new astrophotography mode makes impossible shots of the night sky easy (you’ll need a tripod or some other stable place to prop your phone as it stares at the night sky for a few minutes, adjusting for the earth’s rotation to eliminate apparent movement in the stars). The Pixel 4’s front-facing 8-megapixel camera offers a wider viewing angle, plus a zoom functionality enabled by its software-powered Super Zoom Res feature. You can shoot in photographer-friendly formats like RAW, and quickly access exposure settings to tweak your shot before you hit the shutter (or tell Google to hit it for you).

In a head-to-head photo comparison, you’ll be hard-pressed to determine which standard-issue shot is from which smartphone (though the Pixel 4’s images tend to be cooler in tone than those from the iPhone 11). The Pixel 4 matches the competition when it comes to your standard array of pet photos, people portraits, and whatever else catches your eye. But thanks to Google’s software, it pulls ahead of the competition when it comes to more challenging photo situations. Take zooming in, for instance. Google’s newly included telephoto lens combined with Android’s updated Super Zoom Res feature means your Pixel’s 8x zoom shots will be pretty clear compared to an identical cropped-in image from other high-end smartphones. There are far fewer artifacts, sharper lines, and more detail overall (as long as you keep very still). Unfortunately, it’s difficult to manually swap between one lens or the other, unlike other devices that make switching as simple as swiping.

If you’re looking to use the Pixel 4 to shoot a few videos, you may be slightly disappointed. Compared to the iPhone 11, which shoots in 4K at 60 frames per second on both front and rear cameras, the Pixel 4 only shoots 4K video at 30 frames per second on its rear camera, with the front-facing camera limited to filming in 1080p. It’s not a dealbreaker, but those looking to record high quality video using Google’s fancy software improvements and dual camera setup may want to look elsewhere for more fidelity.

Where the Pixel 4 really shines is in its software, Android 10. It’s Google’s best effort yet, one that borrows some visual ideas from Apple’s iOS while adding its own assistant-powered twist. For the Pixel 4, the software comes first, the device merely being a vehicle for delivering all those smarts that take the headache out of your most monotonous tasks. Slick apps like the new Recorder transcribe audio in real time, no Internet connection required. The same tech powers its Live Caption feature, which does exactly what it says on the tin for any audio or video playing on your phone.

Still, even this latest version of Android isn’t perfect. Yes, Android has grown more polished in recent years. Yes, Google Assistant is more capable than Siri. But there are still bugs, a confusing amount of settings to pore over, and a seemingly perpetual dearth of quality apps and games that keep it from trouncing the competition. The company’s new Game Pass feature, for example, is a far cry from its competition in the form of Apple Arcade, and only serves to highlight the relative lack of polish when it comes to sections of the Android experience, in this case the Google Play Store. Still, Android is getting a lot better, and fast.

So what does the Pixel 4 do that its competition can’t? Besides taking fantastic photos, using new gesture-detecting radar, and giving users an improved software experience thanks to advancements in AI and machine learning, not much. Its miserable battery life does it no favors, and basics like USB-C headphones are nowhere in sight. But the Pixel 4 pushes the boundaries when it comes to the capabilities of Android and Google’s Assistant. Whether that’s enough to get someone to pony up for a new smartphone when last year’s version is still pretty good, however, is a tough sell, especially for such an aggressively bland device.

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Dozens of Republicans stormed a closed-door House session in a bid to call attention to transparency concerns in Trump impeachme

10/23/19 10:04 AM

New story in Technology from Time: Google Has Achieved ‘Quantum Supremacy.’ Just What the Heck Is That?



Here’s a quick bit of topical multiple choice: What is “quantum supremacy?” a) The next blockbuster film in the James Bond series, coming to theaters in the summer of 2020. b) The greatest name for an expansion sports team in all of history. c) Something just achieved by a computer built by one of the world’s biggest and post powerful companies (Hint: it starts with a G and ends with an oogle) and you should be very afraid.

If you answered c, you’re correct — except for the very afraid part. The fact is, quantum supremacy — a term that is burning down the Internet today — is really just an exceedingly fancy way of saying a super-duper kind of computer, one that not only operates on quantum principles, but masters them so deftly that it actually outperforms a traditional computer. (That’s where the “supremacy” part comes from.)

Traditional silicon computers like the one you might be using to read this rely on chips that encode data in one of two states: 1 or 0. Gathered up and organized by the millions, billions and trillions, all those 1’s and 0’s take on meaning in the same way that the 8.3 million pixels in a 4K TV screen, or the who-know-how-many dots in a pointillist painting like George Seraut’s masterpiece Sunday on La Grande Jatte, create a picture.

But 1’s and 0’s are, by definition, binary things — they are one or the other, but they can’t be both. The quantum world exists on a different plane entirely. It is quantum science that allows the question “Is Schrödinger’s cat dead or alive?” to be answered, “Yes.” Ask a quantum scientist if an electron fired at a screen with two slits in it passed through the left slit or the right one, and the answer is likely to be “You bet!” That’s because in the land of the quantum, all things can exist in multiple states at the same time. (The exception: once you observe them, they may flip to one state or the other—which is why if you go to Schrödinger’s house you should not look at his cat because you may kill it in the process and then he’ll get mad.)

A computer built with quantum chips encodes information not in bits, but in qubits — which, as with traditional computers, can exist in the 1 or 0 position, but also the superposition of 1 and zero. To look at a qubit chip is not to see anything special — it looks like an ordinary computer chip, except it relies on particles like ions, photons or electrons, as opposed to simple silicon, interacting in a superconducting, super-cooled state.

The Google computer, known as Sycamore, made the headlines it’s making today by doing nothing terribly important on its own: analyzing a random number generator and confirming that it was indeed working randomly. Nothing to see here, really. But the achievement was deemed worthy of publication in the esteemed journal Nature, as well as in a more readable, less technical Nature explainer titled, with uncharacteristic giddiness, “Hello, Quantum World!”

What makes Google’s accomplishment worthy of the hoopla was, for starters, speed: The Sycamore computer solved the random-number problem in just 200 seconds. Even the most powerful traditional supercomputer would require a somewhat pokier 10,000 years — give or take a century — to achieve the same feat.

More important was the way Google’s quantum computer did its work. When a traditional binary computer tells you that the answer to an equation is, say, 4, that means it is 4. If a quantum computer tells you the same thing, that means the answer is 4 — unless it is 73 or 126 or all of them at once. The quantum computer solves that problem by running the calculation millions of times simultaneously, looking for a so-called probability distribution, which analyzes all of the answers and ultimately discerns the right one. The Nature paper (the fun one) helpfully compares the process to rolling a pair of loaded dice. At first you can’t tell that they’re rigged, but roll them a few thousand or million or billion times and you recognize that 7 or 11 come up far more often than they should. In that discovery lies your answer.

Google does not pretend that Sycamore is remotely ready for prime time. There is far more refinement to come before it has truly practical applications—though even this first random-number result can have value in cryptography. And competitor IBM, in a skeptical blog post, argued that a conventional computer with enough storage space could solve the same problem Sycamore did in just 2.5 days, which is a lot more than 300 seconds, though admittedly a lot less than 10,000 years.

Either way, there’s no denying that a hinge-point in computer history has been turned. Despite the Nature story’s “Hello!” headline, the fact is, the quantum world has always existed. The news — the huge news — is that now we’ve arrived there, too.

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

President Trump announces 'permanent' cease-fire on Syria-Turkey border, end to sanctions on Ankara

10/23/19 8:45 AM

New story in Technology from Time: Google Says it Has Achieved ‘Quantum Supremacy,’ a Major Tech Milestone



Google said it has built a computer that’s reached “quantum supremacy,” performing a computation in 200 seconds that would take the fastest supercomputers about 10,000 years.

The results of Google’s tests, which were conducted using a quantum chip it developed in-house, were published Wednesday in the scientific journal Nature.

“This achievement is the result of years of research and the dedication of many people,” Google engineering director Hartmut Neven said in a blog post. “It’s also the beginning of a new journey: figuring out how to put this technology to work. We’re working with the research community and have open-sourced tools to enable others to work alongside us to identify new applications.”

The idea behind quantum computing is to exponentially improve the processing speed and power of computers to be able to simulate large systems, driving advances in physics, chemistry and other fields. Rather than storing information in binary 0s or 1s like classical computers, quantum computers rely on “qubits”, which can be both 0 and 1 simultaneously, dramatically increasing the amount of information that can be encoded.

But, much like advancements in artificial intelligence, there’s a lot of debate about what constitutes a real breakthrough. Researchers at International Business Machines Corp. said in a blog this week that a simulation of the same task Google used could be done in 2.5 days on a classical computer with enough hard drive storage, not 10,000 years. If quantum supremacy means doing something classical computers can’t, this isn’t it, they wrote.

While the world’s biggest tech companies are racing to develop a quantum computer that passes the scrutiny of academics, some products are commercially available already. In 2011, Canada’s D-Wave Systems Inc. became the first company to sell such a product to businesses and government labs, although unlike machines being built by rivals, its usefulness is limited as the hardware can’t solve any kind of mathematical problem.

A number of other companies — including IBM, Google, Microsoft Corp., and California-based startup Rigetti Computing — are pushing to create more powerful machines that businesses can use. They’ve also made some of their technology available for researchers to experiment with via the internet.

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

39 bodies discovered in truck container in southeast England, suspect arrested

10/23/19 2:17 AM

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Fox News Breaking News Alert

Hong Kong formally withdraws extradition bill

10/23/19 12:45 AM

Tuesday, 22 October 2019

New story in Technology from Time: Annie Leibovitz on the Democratization of Photography, Her Influences and Her Google Pixel Campaign



Annie Leibovitz, who has been photographing the world’s most influential figures for the past 49 years, revealed last week a new campaign called “Face Forward” shot exclusively on the Google Pixel smartphone. The new series done in partnership with Google features portraits of James Turrell, Megan Rapino, Chase Strangio, and others. “Face Forward” has been in the works for over a year as a project to document the stories of some of the most prominent changemakers today. “It’s an incredible opportunity for us to celebrate people in the present who are doing things to create a better future,” journalist and activist Noor Tagouri, who was photographed for the campaign, tells TIME.

Leibovitz, who helped in the development phases of the camera in the new Google Pixel, is far from new in working with high-profile figures and successfully capturing their stories, but “Face Forward” is her first series shot entirely on smartphone. The photographer says she was “suspicious” when working with an older version of the smartphone at first but felt impressed by it this time.

Here’s what Leibovitz had to say about her new campaign and what the democratization of photography means today.

How did you choose the subjects for this campaign?

Originally I thought I was just going to drive across the country and meet people, like Robert Frank. We got more realistic about time and zeroed in on people who are taking things very head-on and were important in their worlds, giving us hope in our world. I went back to some original sources, like Gloria Steinem, and asked her for lists. Some of the Native American subjects came from Gloria Steinem, and then we just did our due diligence, looking at every list of people who mattered and were doing things.

What do you hope sharing these portraits will accomplish or what feelings do you want them to spark in a viewer?

I think what we’re trying to do is recognize these people as people who are setting a tone and setting standards. I remember going out to photograph Bobbi Jean Three Legs at Standing Rock Reservation where she has worked so hard to protest the pipeline, and you get out to her land and you’re really brought to your knees when you see the beauty of this country. In that photograph, we’re standing on the edge of the Missouri River, and you realize her love for her land and her reservation.

How do you think this project fits into your work?

It fits in perfectly. I don’t get a chance to always do this kind of work. Vogue has always been politically conscious. We just did Congresswoman McBath, whose son was killed through gun violence, and I just did Nancy Pelosi for Vanity Fair. At this point in my life, I try to direct my work a little better, but I think this is really the time for this type of work.

The campaign is meant “to find a new way to document individuals making change in the world today.” Why is it important document change today?

I feel I am not unique in this respect; we all want to care and know about people who are doing the right things so we can have a sense of hope. The state of this country and our government today has brought out in every which way the most extraordinary, incredible people who care about who we are, what we’re doing, and what matters.

Annie Leibovitz Face Forward Google Pixel
© Annie Leibovitz. From Annie Leibovitz: Face ForwardBryan Stevenson

What is the role of photographs in making change today?

Photographs have never been better. I admire The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Time. Photojournalism has never been better. We’ve been relentless, and we have to be relentless to get things moved along. I find the portrait very powerful when it’s done well. In this particular set of pictures, there are two pictures that create the person–there’s a portrait of the person and then there’s something else that is in their life. With Bryan Stevenson, his great, great grandparents were slaves, and this other photo alongside his portrait is in a plantation outside of Montgomery, Alabama. You can see the slave quarters, and there’s this tree, which you can draw your own conclusions on. It’s a brief photo story.

Did any recent events, in particular, prompt you to work on a series centered around social changemakers?

I’ve always been interested in politics, from my early years at Rolling Stone and being on the road with Hunter S. Thompson. I’ve always been interested in social commentary, being on the road with Tom Wolfe. Today, it’s not one event, since this president has been in office, every single day something terrible, horrible comes up. I was trying to do this interview without having to bring him up.

How do you avoid glamour in your photos, making them more personal and intimate rather?

I like people to look like themselves. I do do work for Vogue, and sometimes I get a little frustrated, but they kind of know they’re not going to get the normal fashion picture. I started off as a fine art photographer, and I went to the San Francisco Art Institute. The photographers I admired were Robert Frank and Henri Cartier-Bresson and personalized reportage. When I first started working for Rolling Stone, I wondered if it was possible to work in a commercial landscape and take good pictures. I found that most of the really good photographers at school weren’t interested in something like Rolling Stone, but I found that in the commercial landscape of magazine work or doing something like this for Google, you can make something of it. You shouldn’t be shy to step into it to try to do something that is meaningful and goes to another place. You’re being given a space in a landscape to use and not abuse. Use it! When Google gave it to me they basically said ‘what do you want to do,’ and I thought of what I don’t get to do, and that’s what I did.

This campaign was shot exclusively on smartphone. How do you think the increased accessibility of the medium of photography is a positive thing?

Anything that makes photography easier is a good thing. The first photographers had to be scientists and chemists. I was brought up with going to the dark room and seeing the image show up in the pan. It was so romantic and magic, pure magic. It’s a new time now. There’s new technology, which is exciting too! I was very, very interested in trying to do a project with the camera phone because I really do believe in it, and I wanted to talk to the people who make them to maybe make them more useful for photographers. Quite honestly, using it as itself, rather than trying to make it a regular camera, I really did feel like I was gliding with it. You take pictures with your heart, your eyes, how you look, how you see and how you perceive in your mind; the equipment has very little to do with it in a way.

How much do you research or learn about a subject prior to a shoot or do you mostly learn their story along the way?

Of course you find out everything you can. I wouldn’t have found about Sarah Zorn’s boots if I didn’t learn when she was three years old she walked in her grandfather’s boots. You have to do your research.

Ad 1